Evaluation

Writing Model: Character Sketch



Teacher's Name: ___________________________________________

Student's Name: ___________________________________________
CATEGORY 4 = Exceeds the Standard 3 = Meets the Standard 2 = Partially Meets the Standard 1 = Does not Meet the Standard Score
Introduction (Organization) The introduction is inviting, states the main topic and previews the structure of the paper. The introduction clearly states the main topic and previews the structure of the paper, but is not particularly inviting to the reader. The introduction states the main topic, but does not adequately preview the structure of the paper nor is it particularly inviting to the reader. There is no clear introduction of the main topic or structure of the paper.  
Support for Topic (Content) Relevant, telling, quality details give the reader important information that goes beyond the obvious or predictable. Supporting details and information are relevant, but one key issue or portion of the storyline is unsupported. Supporting details and information are relevant, but several key issues or portions of the storyline are unsupported. Supporting details and information are typically unclear or not related to the topic.  
Sentence Structure (Sentence Fluency) All sentences are well-constructed with varied structure. Most sentences are well-constructed with varied structure. Most sentences are well-constructed but have a similar structure. Sentences lack structure and appear incomplete or rambling.  
Transitions (Organization) A variety of thoughtful transitions are used. They clearly show how ideas are connected. Transitions clearly show how ideas are connected, but there is little variety. Some transitions work well; but connections between other ideas are fuzzy. The transitions between ideas are unclear or nonexistant.  
Conclusion (Organization) The conclusion is strong and leaves the reader with a feeling that they understand what the writer is "getting at." The conclusion is recognizable and ties up almost all the loose ends. The conclusion is recognizable, but does not tie up several loose ends. There is no clear conclusion, the paper just ends.  
Grammar & Spelling (Conventions) Writer makes no errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content. Writer makes 1-2 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content. Writer makes 3-4 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content. Writer makes more than 4 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content.  
Capitalization & Punctuation (Conventions) Writer makes no errors in capitalization or punctuation, so the paper is exceptionally easy to read. Writer makes 1 or 2 errors in capitalization or punctuation, but the paper is still easy to read. Writer makes a few errors in capitalization and/or punctuation that catch the reader's attention and interrupt the flow. Writer makes several errors in capitalization and/or punctuation that catch the reader's attention and greatly interrupt the flow.  

Total

       /28

 

Evaluation:  Newsletter

Teacher's Name: ______________________________________

Student's Name: ______________________________

CATEGORY 4 = Exceeds the Standard 3 = Meets the Standard 2 = Partially Meets the Standard 1 = Does not Meet the Standard
Who, What, When, Where & How All articles adequately address the 5 W's (who, what, when, where and how). 90-99% of the articles adequately address the 5 W's (who, what, when, where and how). 75-89% of the articles adequately address the 5 W's (who, what, when, where and how). Less than 75% of the articles adequately address the 5 W's (who, what, when, where, and how).
Articles - Supporting Details The details in the articles are clear, effective, and vivid 80-100% of the time. The details in the articles are clear and pertinent 90-100% of the time. The details in the articles are clear and pertinent 75-89% of the time. The details in more than 25% of the articles are neither clear nor pertinent.
Editorials - Worthwhile The information was accurate and there was a clear reason for including the editorial in the newspaper. The information was accurate and there was a fairly good reason for including the editorial in the newspaper. The information was occasionally inaccurate or misleading, but there was a clear reason for including the editorial in the newspaper. The information was typically inaccurate, misleading or libelous.
Layout - Headlines & Captions All articles have headlines that capture the reader's attention and accurately describe the content. All articles have a byline. All graphics have captions that adequately describe the people and action in the graphic. All articles have headlines that accurately describe the content. All articles have a byline. All graphics have captions. Most articles have headlines that accurately describe the content. All articles have a byline. Most graphics have captions. Articles are missing bylines OR many articles do not have adequate headlines OR many graphics do not have captions.
Knowledge Gained All students in the group can accurately answer all questions related to 
a) stories in the newspaper and
b) technical processes used to create the newspaper.
All students in the group can accurately answer most questions related to
 a) stories in the newspaper and
b) technical processes used to create the newspaper.
Most students in the group can accurately answer most questions related to 
a) stories in the newspaper and
b) technical processes used to create the newspaper.
Several students in the group appear to have little knowledge about the facts and the technical processes used for the newspaper.