Evaluation - Raging Waters!
Group Planning - Research Project :
Group Planning
| CATEGORY | 4 = exceeds the standard | 3 = meets the standard | 2 = partially meets the standard | 1= does not meet standard |
|
Ideas/Research
Questions
|
Researchers independently identify at least 4 reasonable, insightful,
creative ideas/questions to pursue when doing the research.
|
Researchers independently identify at least 4 reasonable ideas/questions
to pursue when doing the research.
|
Researchers identify, with some adult help, at least 4 reasonable
ideas/questions to pursue when doing the research.
|
Researchers identify, with considerable adult help, 4 reasonable
ideas/questions to pursue when doing the research.
|
|
Group
Timeline
|
Group independently develops a reasonable, complete timeline describing
when different parts of the work (e.g., planning, research, first draft,
final draft) will be done. All students in group can independently
describe the high points of the timeline.
|
Group independently develops a timeline describing when most parts of
the work will be done. All students in group can independently describe
the high points of the timeline.
|
Group independently develops a timeline describing when most parts of
the work will be done. Most students can independently describe the high
points of the timeline.
|
Group needs adult help to develop a timeline AND/OR several students in
the group cannot independently describe the high points of the timeline.
|
|
Delegation
of Responsibility
|
Each student in the group can clearly explain what information is needed
by the group, what information s/he is responsible for locating, and
when the information is needed.
|
Each student in the group can clearly explain what information s/he is
responsible for locating.
|
Each student in the group can, with minimal prompting from peers,
clearly explain what information s/he is responsible for locating.
|
One or more students in the group cannot clearly explain what
information they are responsible for locating.
|
|
Plan
for Organizing Information
|
Students have developed a clear plan for organizing the information as
it is gathered and in the final research product. All students can
independently explain the planned organization of the research findings.
|
Students have developed a clear plan for organizing the information in
the final research product. All students can independently explain this
plan.
|
Students have developed a clear plan for organizing the information as
it is gathered. All students can independently explain most of this
plan.
|
Students have no clear plan for organizing the information AND/OR
students in the group cannot explain their organizational plan.
|
|
Quality
of Sources
|
Researchers independently locate at least 2 reliable, interesting
information sources for EACH of their ideas or questions.
|
Researchers independently locate at least 2 reliable information sources
for EACH of their ideas or questions.
|
Researchers, with some adult help, locate at least 2 reliable
information sources for EACH of their ideas or questions.
|
Researchers, with extensive adult help, locate at least 2 reliable
information sources for EACH of their ideas or questions.
|
Research Report
| CATEGORY | 4 = exceeds the standard | 3 = meets the standard | 2 = partially meets the standard | 1= does not meet standard |
|
Overarching Question Integrating Natural Events |
Information clearly answers the
overarching question; a strong logical argument presents a clear
connection (or lack of thereof) between natural events; includes several
supporting details and/or examples.
|
Information clearly answers the
overarching question; a logical argument presents a clear connection (or
lack of thereof) between natural events; provides 1-2
supporting details and/or examples.
|
Information addresses the
overarching question; however no details and/or examples are given to
support arguments.
|
Overarching question is not answered.
|
|
Application of Thinking Maps |
Thinking Maps illustrate a clear thought
process appropriately supporting the group's argument.
Illustrations add to the reader's
understanding of the topic.
|
Thinking Maps appropriately support
group's argument leading to the conclusion and add to the reader's
understanding of the topic.
|
Thinking Maps somewhat support group's
argument and sometimes add to
the reader's understanding of the topic.
|
Thinking Maps are not applied
appropriately or are not used. .
|
|
Organization
|
Information is very organized with well-constructed paragraphs and
subheadings.
|
Information is organized with well-constructed paragraphs.
|
Information is organized, but paragraphs are not well-constructed.
|
The information appears to be
disorganized.
|
|
Mechanics
|
No grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors.
|
Almost no grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors
|
A few grammatical spelling, or punctuation errors.
|
Many grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors.
|
|
Sources |
All sources (information and graphics) are accurately documented in the
desired format.
|
All sources (information and graphics) are accurately documented, but a
few are not in the desired format.
|
All sources (information and graphics) are accurately documented, but
many are not in the desired format.
|
Some sources are not accurately documented
|